Supreme Court Briefs
Before presenting their oral arguments, counsel for both sides will submit a legal brief summarizing the facts of the case as well as the legal reasoning behind their arguments. Cases set for hearing during the current Supreme Court term, for which FindLaw has online versions of briefs, are listed below in alphabetical order by case name.
Have a Supreme Court merit or amicus brief you'd like to post on FindLaw? Submit it here!
|
Briefs for Term:
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999
October 2000 Term
Alabama v. Bozeman (No. 00-492)
Alexander v. Sandoval (No. 99-1908)
Am. Trucking Assns. v. Browner (No. 99-1426)
Artuz v. Bennett (No. 99-1238)
Atwater v. City of Lago Vista
Bartnicki v. Vopper (No. 99-1687)
Becker v. Montgomery (No. 00-6374)
Booth v. Churner (No. 99-1964)
Brentwood Academy v. TN Secondary School (No. 99-901)
Browner v. Am. Trucking Assns. (No. 99-1257)
Buckman Company v. Plaintiffs' Legal Committee (No. 98-1768)
Buckhannon Board & Care Home v. WV Dept. Health & Human Resources (No. 99-1848)
Bush v. Gore (No. 00-949)
Bush v. Palm Beach County Canvassing Board (No. 00-836)
C & L Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizen Potawatomi Nation (No. 00-292)
Calcano-Martinez v. INS (No. 00-1011)
Cedric Kushner Productions, Ltd. v. Don King (No. 00-549)
Central Green v. United States (No. 99-859)
Circuit City Stores Inc. v. Adams (No. 99-1379)
City of Indianapolis v. Edmond (No. 99-1030)
Cleveland v. United States (No. 99-804)
Cook v. Gralike (No. 99-929)
Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc. (No. 99-2035)
Daniels v. United States (No. 99-9136)
Department of Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Association (No. 99-1871)
Dir. of Revenue of Mo. v. Cobank ACB (No. 99-1792)
Duncan v. Walker (No. 00-121)
Eastern Associated Coal Corp. v. United Mine Workers, Dist. 17 (No. 99-1038)
Egelhoff v. Egelhoff (No. 99-1529)
FEC v. Colorado Republican Federal Campaign (No. 00-191)
Ferguson v. City of Charleston (No. 99-936)
Florida v. Thomas (No. 00-391)
Gitlitz v. Commissioner (No. 99-1295)
Glover v. United States (No. 99-8576)
Good News Club v. Milford Central School (No. 99-2036)
Green Tree Fin. Corp. v. Randolph (No. 99-1235)
GTE Service Corp. v. FCC (No. 99-1244)
Hunt v. Cromartie (No. 99-1864)
Idaho v. United States (No. 00-189)
Illinois v. McArthur (No. 99-1132)
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. St. Cyr (No. 00-767)
Kyllo v. United States (No. 99-8508)
Lackawanna County District Attorney v. Coss (No. 99-1884)
Legal Services Corp. v. Velazquez (No. 99-603)
Lewis v. Lewis & Clark Marine, Inc. (No. 99-1331)
Lopez v. Davis (No. 99-7504)
Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Reilly (No. 00-596, 00-597)
Lujan v. G & G Fire Sprinklers, Inc. (No. 00-152)
Murphy v. Beck (No. 00-46)
Nevada v. Hicks (No. 99-1994)
New York Times Company v. Tasini (No. 00-201)
Nguyen v. INS (No. 99-2071)
NLRB v. Kentucky River Community Care, Inc. (No. 99-1815)
Norfolk Shipbuilding & Drydock Corp. v. Garris (No. 00-346)
Palazzolo v. Rhode Island ex rel. Tavares (No. 99-2047)
Pollard v. Du Pont (No. 00-763)
Reno v. Ma (No. 00-38)
Rogers v. Tennessee (No. 99-6218)
Saucier v. Katz (No. 99-1977)
Shaw v. Murphy (No. 99-1613)
Seling v. Young (No. 99-1185)
Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp. (No. 99-1551)
Smallwood v. Cromartie (No. 99-1865)
Solid Waste Agency v. U.S. Army Corp. Engineers (No. 99-1178)
Texas v. Cobb (No. 99-1702)
Traffix Devices v. Marketing Displays (No. 99-1571)
United Dominion Industries, Inc. v. United States (No. 00-157)
United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Cooperative (No. 00-151)
United States v. Cleveland Indians Baseball (No. 00-203)
United States v. Hatter (No. 99-1978)
United States v. Mead (No. 99-1434)
United States v. United Foods (No. 00-276)
United States v. Velazquez (No. 99-960)
United States v. Vopper (No. 99-1728)
Univ. of AL Board of Trustees v. Garrett (No. 99-1240)
Zadvydas v. Underdown (No. 99-7791)
