Rockwell International Corp., et al. v. United States, et al.

Subject:

False Claims Act, Original Source, Qui Tam Actions, Appointments and Take Care Clauses

Whether the Tenth Circuit erred by affirming the entry of judgment in favor of a qui tam relator under the False Claims Act, based on a misinterpretation of the statutory definition of an “original source” set forth in 31 U.S.C. § 3730(e)(4)?

• U.S. Court of Appeals - 10th Circuit, Unpublished Opinion Filed: March 5, 2004
• United States Supreme Court, Cert. Granted: September 26, 2006

Resources:

• Docket Sheet From the U.S. Supreme Court.
• Northwestern University - Medill School of Journalism: On the Docket

Briefs: Petition Phase Certiorari Petition Brief for the United States in Opposition Respondent Stone's Brief in Opposition Reply to Briefs in Opposition Amicus Brief of the Chamber of Commerce Merits Phase Petitioner's Brief Brief for the United States Petitioner's Reply Brief Amici Brief of the Chamber of Commerce, et al. Amici Brief of the American Hospital Ass'n, et al.	Counsel of Record For Petitioners Rockwell Int'l, et al.: Maureen E. Mahoney Latham & Watkins LLP Washington, DC For Respondent Stone: Maria T. Vullo Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison New York, NY For Respondent United States: Paul D. Clement U.S. Solicitor General Washington, DC
Oct | Nov | Dec | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | Unscheduled | Previous Terms   To view PDF files listed on this page you will need Adobe Acrobat Reader