[Download January 12, 2008 Argument Calendar PDF]
Title:
Pacific Bell Telephone Company, dba AT&T California, et al. v. linkLine Communications, Inc., et al.
Subject:
Antitrust & Trade Regulation, Communications Law
Question:
Whether a plaintiff states a claim under Section 2 of the Sherman Act by alleging
that the defendant - a vertically integrated retail competitor with an alleged
monopoly at the wholesale level but no antitrust duty to provide the wholesale input
to competitors - engaged in a “price squeeze” by leaving insufficient margin
between wholesale and retail prices to allow the plaintiff to compete.
Decisions:
Resources:
Briefs:
|
| |
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive] To view PDF files listed on this page you will need Adobe Acrobat Reader
| ||