Supreme Court Orders




(ORDER LIST: 530 U.S.)

THURSDAY, JUNE 29, 2000


CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION

98-1658 ) HELMS, MARY L., ET AL. V. PICARD, SUPT., LA PUB. ED.
        )
98-1671 ) PICARD, CECIL J., ET AL. V. HELMS, MARY L., ET AL.

                   The Court reversed the judgment below in
              Mitchell v. Helms, 530 U.S. ___ (2000). Therefore,
              the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted
              and the cases are remanded to the United States
              Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further
              proceedings.

99-1152   HOPE CLINIC, ET AL. V. RYAN, IL ATTY. GEN., ET AL.

                   The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
              The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
              United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
              for further consideration in light of Stenberg v. Carhart,
              530 U.S. ____ (2000).

99-1156 )  PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WI V. DOYLE, WI ATTY. GEN., ET AL.
        )
99-1177 )  CHRISTENSEN, DENNIS D. V. DOYLE, WI ATTY. GEN., ET AL.

                   The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.
              The judgment is vacated and the cases are remanded to the
              United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
              for further consideration in light of Stenberg v. Carhart,
              530 U.S. ____ (2000).

99-7890   GREEN, LEROY V. UNITED STATES

                   The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in
              forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari
              are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is
              remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the
              Fourth Circuit for further consideration in light of
              Dickerson v. United States, 530 U.S. ____ (2000).

99-8176   JONES, CARLESS V. UNITED STATES

                   The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in
              forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari
              are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is
              remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the
              Tenth Circuit for further consideration in light of
              Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. ____ (2000).


ORDERS IN PENDING CASES

99M95     FARLEY, DAVID WILLIAM V. TEXAS

                   The motion to direct the Clerk to file a
              petition for a writ of certiorari out-of-time
              under Rule 14.5 is denied.

99M96     VIRAMONTES, JOEL F. V. GALAZA, WARDEN
99M97     GARDNER, BRUCE, ET UX. V. UNITED STATES

                   The motions to direct the Clerk to file
              petitions for writs of certiorari out-of-time
              are denied.

126, ORIG. KANSAS V. NEBRASKA, ET AL.

                   The motion of Nebraska to dismiss is denied,
              and the case is recommitted to the Special Master
              for further proceedings.

130, ORIG. NEW HAMPSHIRE V. MAINE

                   The motion for leave to file a bill of complaint
              is granted, and defendant is allowed 60 days within
              which to file a motion to dismiss on res judicata
              grounds. Plaintiff is allowed 45 days to file a response
              to the motion. The Solicitor General is invited to file a
              brief expressing the views of the United States. Justice
              Souter took no part in the consideration or decision of
              this order.

99-936    FERGUSON, CRYSTAL M., ET AL. V. CHARLESTON, SC, ET AL.

                   The motion of American Civil Liberties Union, et
              al., for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is
              granted. The motion of National Coalition for Child
              Protection Reform, et al., for leave to file a brief as
              amici curiae is granted. The motion of NARAL Foundation,
              et al., for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is
              granted. The motion of American Public Health
              Association, et al., for leave to file a brief as amici
              curiae is granted. The motion of American Medical
              Association for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae
              is granted.

99-8898   NAGY, PAUL V. UNITED STATES

                   The motion of petitioner for reconsideration of
              order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis is
              denied.

99-9576   VIELE, DAWN, ET VIR V. FORD MOTOR CO.

                   The motion of petitioners for leave to proceed in
              forma pauperis is denied. Petitioners are allowed until
              July 20, 2000, within which to pay the docketing fee
              required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in
              compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.


CERTIORARI GRANTED

98-1768   BUCKMAN COMPANY V. PLAINTIFFS' LEGAL COMMITTEE

                   The motion of Medical Device Manufacturers
              Association for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae
              is granted. The motion of Danek Medical, Inc., for leave
              to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The motion
              of Product Liability Advisory Council, Inc., for leave to
              file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The motion of
              Pharmceutical Research and Manufacturers of America for
              leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The
              petition for a writ of certiorari is granted limited to
              the following question: Whether federal law preempts
              state-law tort claims alleging fraud on the Food and
              Drug Administration during the regulatory process for
              marketing clearance applicable to certain medical
              devices.


CERTIORARI DENIED

99-1112   MILLER, ATTY. GEN. OF IOWA V. PLANNED PARENTHOOD, ET AL.
99-1307   HOTTE, CLIFFORD V. UNITED STATES
99-1416   BROWN, DALE A., ET AL. V. UNITED STATES, ET AL.
99-1462   FORT WORTH, TX V. DEPT. OF TRANSP., ET AL.
99-1517   UNIVERSAL MANAGEMENT, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
99-1552   FOSTER, GOV. OF LA, ET AL. vs. O'NEILL, PHILLIP, ET AL.
99-1577   GREENBRIER, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
99-1580   JARAMILLO, LETICIA, ET AL. vs. FCC
99-1596   CARNIVAL CRUISE LINES, INC. V. UNITED STATES
99-1600   PRINCESS CRUISES, INC. V. UNITED STATES
99-1641   U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS, INC. vs. MFS INTELENET, INC., ET AL.
99-1674   VANDEL, MARTIN V. STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS
99-1698   UNITED AIRLINES, ET AL. V. DENVER, CO
99-1718   JAMES, LESVILLE, ETC., ET AL. V. ZURICH-AMERICAN INS. CO.
99-1727   GATES, TERESA A. V. FORREST GEN. HOSP., ET AL.
99-1729   UNIVERSE SALES CO. V. OFFSHORE SPORTSWEAR, ET AL.
99-1738   CHILDREN'S SEASHORE HOUSE V. GUHL, MICHELE, ETC., ET AL.
99-1741   SUNOCO, INC., ET AL. V. SEYMOUR, STEVEN, ET UX.
99-1748   WILEY, WILLIAM L. V. MISSISSIPPI
99-1751   OCEANSIDE-MISSION ASSOCS. V. OCEANSIDE, CA
99-1758   DE RIVER PORT AUTH. V. FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE
99-1762   VA ELEC. & LIGHTING CORP. V. NAT'L SERV. INDUSTRIES, INC.
99-1763   GULF INS. CO. V. SIEGFRIED CONSTR., INC.
99-1769   STRAIN, RODNEY JACK, ETC. V. CLIFFORD, DAVID, ETC.
99-1770   SIMPSON, LARRY D. V. GALANOS, CHRIS, ET AL.
99-1772   PORT AUTH. OF NY AND NJ vs. RYDUCHOWSKI, DANUTA
99-1774   DILLARD DEPT. STORES V. BECKWITH, DELORES
99-1794   GERRISH, KEITH G. V. GENESEE CTY., NY, ET AL.
99-1795   CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC. V. JOHNSON, DEMEKA
99-1802   ALTSCHULER, HOWARD V. UNIV. OF PA LAW SCH., ET AL.
99-1808   SMITH, GARY L. V. UNITED STATES
99-1825   PORT JEFFERSON HEALTH CARE V. WING, BRIAN, ET AL.
99-1839   HARRIS, EDWARD V. WEST, SEC. OF VETS AFFAIRS
99-1879   HARDY, JULIE, ETC., ET AL. V. TESTA, MICHAEL, ET AL.
99-1886   CIRAULO, ANTONIO V. MICHIGAN
99-1889   VALICENTI ADVISORY SERV. vs. SEC
99-1898   KHAN, ZYROON V. ABERCROMBIE & FITCH, INC.
99-1917   COZART, FREDERICK L. V. UNITED STATES
99-1921   TITTJUNG, ANTON V. RENO, ATTY. GEN., ET AL.
99-1926   LANZOTTI, DAVID V. UNITED STATES
99-1928   TARAWALY, TEJAN V. FARREY, WARDEN
99-1931   BEARDSLEE, FLORENCE M. V. UNITED STATES
99-1936   RAYHANI, JAFAR POUR, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
99-1941   IDEMA, JONATHAN K. V. UNITED STATES
99-1949   NIJMEH, KENNEDY V. UNITED STATES
99-1954   PERSON, MARION BROOKS V. UNITED STATES
99-7579   COTTON, MARCUS B. V. TEXAS
99-8165 ) HARDY, PAUL V. UNITED STATES
        )
99-8184 ) CAUSEY, DAMON V. UNITED STATES
        )
99-8285 ) DAVIS, LEN V. UNITED STATES
99-8463   WIGGINS, DERRICK L. V. UNITED STATES
99-8489   BOBILLO, BILL V. UNITED STATES
99-8675   OMELEBELE, NDUBISI V. vs. UNITED STATES
99-8839   PISTONE, SALVATORE V. UNITED STATES
99-8848   KOONS, MARC A. V. UNITED STATES
99-8978   MARTIN, RAY V. ORANGE DISTRICT SCHOOLS
99-9151   DAVIS, JOSEPH H. V. FLORIDA
99-9193   RENOIR, PIERRE A. V. ANGELONE, DIR., VA DOC
99-9229   SARTORI, HELLFRIED E. V. VIRGINIA
99-9260   STATON, KIM R. V. YUKINS, WARDEN
99-9276   WILLIAMS, MICHAEL G. V. ZELLER, WARDEN, ET AL.
99-9278   PON, WILLIAM, ET UX. V. SAN FRANCISCO, CA
99-9283   BILLUPS, DERRICK V. PRUNTY, WARDEN, ET AL.
99-9288   KUPLEN, JOHN E. V. FRANKLIN, RICHARD, ET AL.
99-9289   KIRKENDALL, DONNA V. UNIV. OF CT HEALTH CENTER
99-9301   JONES, STANLEY V. PA WORKERS' COMP. BD.
99-9302   NAVA, AARON V. GARCIA, WARDEN, ET AL.
99-9303   LaBRANCH, GARY W. V. CALIFORNIA
99-9305   ALLISON, EDUARDO V. BRONSON, MS.
99-9309   STOCKENAUER, GORDON L. V. KAPTURE, WARDEN, ET AL.
99-9310   RISLEY, BILLY R. V. SCOTT, FORMER DIR., TX DCJ
99-9311   JACKSON, RONALD V. NEW YORK, ET AL.
99-9312   MERILATT, PHILIPP V. NEW MEXICO
99-9313   WILLIAMS, WOODROW W. vs. CHOATE, SHERIFF, ET AL.
99-9318   JACOBSEN-WAYNE, KILDEE V. KAM, CALVIN C., ET AL.
99-9324   SANGSTER, ANN V. YUKINS, WARDEN
99-9338   MAFFE, BRIAN A. V. SCOTT, WARDEN, ET AL.
99-9340   SAVIOR, OLE V. HUMPHREY, HUBERT H., ET AL.
99-9342   WALSH, JOHN E. V. CORCORAN, WARDEN, ET AL.
99-9343   WARD, LeMARR A. V. TERRANGI, WARDEN
99-9344   WILLIAMS, LIONELL E. V. NEWSWEEK, INC., ET AL.
99-9352   KREPS, GENE A. V. PESINA, GREGORY J., ET AL.
99-9353   MARCELLO, JAMES V. ME DEPT. OF HUMAN SERVICES
99-9356   BAILEY, MAURICE E. V. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
99-9360   SHOMO, KARL V. NEW YORK
99-9366   WALKER, DAMON F. V. GASPARINI, SHERIFF, ET AL.
99-9387   BARRITT, ROBERT M. V. WEST VIRGINIA
99-9401   SATTERWHITE JOHN T. V. JOHNSON, DIR., TX DCJ
99-9408   WILLIAMS, WAYNE V. vs. CONROY, WARDEN
99-9411   TAYLOR, BERNARD V. LARKINS, SUPT., DALLAS
99-9413   COLON, NELSON M. V. ARTUZ, SUPT., GREEN HAVEN
99-9464   JEMZURA, RAYMOND V. NY STATE DEPT. OF MOTOR VEH.
99-9468   SHABAZZ, MICHAEL A. Z. vs. NEW YORK
99-9474   TALFORD, SALLY V. SCARBERRY, KERMIT
99-9502   BOYD, DENNIS M. V. DAVIS, CLERK, ETC.
99-9533   PRICE, JOSEPH W. V. RYDER SYSTEM, INC., ET AL.
99-9538   WATSON, TERESA V. SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE
99-9571   BEADLES, JOE HAVEN V. UNITED STATES
99-9592   GONZALEZ, JACQUELINE V. WEST, SEC. OF VA, ET AL.
99-9601   VEGA, STEVE V. ADULT PROB. DEPT., COOK CTY.
99-9604   McKEE, DONALD V. FLORIDA
99-9608   BOLTON, JACQUELINE V. UNITED STATES
99-9622   MARTINEZ, ADALBERTO V. MASSACHUSETTS
99-9631   BARBER, SCOTT M. V. MICHIGAN
99-9632   CICCHINELLI, ROBERT V. PENNSYLVANIA
99-9650   SALLEY, DAVID C. V. LUEBBERS, SUPT., POTOSI
99-9651   PHILLIPS, JACK D. V. BUSH, GOV. OF FL
99-9659   ANDREWS, GARY V. CAIN, WARDEN
99-9667   ACKLIN, MARVIN A. V. NORRIS, DIR., AR DOC
99-9675   PARSONS, KENNETH D. V. RYDER, SUPT., TOMOKA
99-9682   PALMER, CHARLES V. UNITED STATES
99-9687   BROCKMAN, WILLIAM T. V. SOUTH CAROLINA
99-9692   MENDOZA-MARTINEZ, CESARIO V. UNITED STATES
99-9696   OSWALD, JAMES H. V. WISCONSIN
99-9709   ANDERSON, DENNIS E. V. OHIO
99-9717   OAKLEY, JON C. V. UNITED STATES
99-9718   OCHSNER, LARRY L. V. PRATT, WARDEN
99-9726   SEIBEL, GLENN V. OHIO
99-9730   GAONA-HERNANDEZ, FRANCISCO V. UNITED STATES
99-9734   WATSON, ROBERT G. V. KONTEH, WARDEN
99-9736   CAMPILLO-RESTREPO, IVAN V. UNITED STATES
99-9749   WHITE, HARVEY L. V. OHIO
99-9757   COSTA, BERNARDO O. V. MISSOURI
99-9785   KIISTER, VICTOR S. V. UNITED STATES
99-9787   CARMOUCHE, ANTHONY V. UNITED STATES
99-9790   LIVINGSTON, MARCIA E. V. UNITED STATES
99-9791   JOHNSON, JERRELL L. V. UNITED STATES
99-9796   HUDSON, CHARLES V. UNITED STATES
99-9803   PAGAN, MIGUEL V. UNITED STATES
99-9805   WILLIAMS, MARCUS V. UNITED STATES
99-9816   DAVIS, DANNY V. UNITED STATES
99-9820   HEWLETT, WILLIAM V. LAPPIN, WARDEN
99-9828   MARZETTE, JACQUELYN V. UNITED STATES
99-9834   BEASLEY, ROBERT I. V. UNITED STATES
99-9835   COKER, NATHANIEL V. UNITED STATES
99-9838   HUGHES, WILLIAM R. V. UNITED STATES
99-9839   FULLER, BRIAN A. V. UNITED STATES
99-9846   SHURLAND, DAVID P. V. UNITED STATES
99-9859   COOPER, ADRIAN L. V. UNITED STATES
99-9860   BUGH, RICHARD V. OHIO
99-9861   CARTER, RASHAWN V. UNITED STATES
99-9883   WOOD, JEROME L. V. UNITED STATES
99-9884   WILLIAMS, ELIJAH V. UNITED STATES
99-9917   BURKET, RUSSEL W. V. ANGELONE, DIR., VA DOC

                   The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

99-1584   CALIFORNIA V. JOHNSON, BRENT A.

                   The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in
              forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of
              certiorari is denied.

99-1691   BOULAHANIS, CHRIS, ET AL. V. BOARD OF REGENTS, IL ST.

                   The motion of Dennis Hastert, Speaker of the House,
              et al., for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is
              granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is
              denied.

99-1739 ) DALLAS-FORT WORTH INTL. AIRP V. DEPT. OF TRANSP., ET AL.
        )
99-1745 ) AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. V. DEPT. OF TRANSP., ET AL.

                   The motion of Airports Council International-North
              America for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is
              granted. The petitions for writs of certiorari are
              denied.

99-9268   ROCHON, RAYMOND V. LOUISIANA

                   The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in
              forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of
              certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.

99-9284   COTNER, ROBERT E. V. BOONE, WARDEN
99-9306   COTNER, ROBERT E. V. COURT OF CRIM. APPEALS OF OK
99-9374   COUSINO, PAUL W. V. KIEFER, JOHN B.
99-9375   COUSINO, PAUL W. V. SUPREME COURT OF MI

                   The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed
              in forma pauperis are denied, and the petitions for
              writs of certiorari are dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As
              petitioners have repeatedly abused this Court's process,
              the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions
              in noncriminal matters from petitioners unless the docketing
              fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is
              submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin
              v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S.1
              (1992) (per curiam). Justice Stevens dissents.
              See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.


HABEAS CORPUS DENIED

99-9822   IN RE SCOTT A. HEIMERMANN
99-9894   IN RE RUBEN JONES
99-9974   IN RE NOE MANCILLAS

                   The petitions for writs of habeas corpus are
              denied.


REHEARINGS DENIED

99-1193   FRAZER, RAYMOND L. V. CALIFORNIA
99-1475   STONIER, PAMELA, ET AL. V. DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP.
99-1543   JOHNSON, DONALD E. V. JOHNSON, RICHARD G., ET AL.
99-7470   LOFTON, JAMES E. V. JOHNSON, DIR., TX DCJ
99-8153   FLOURNOY, RONALD V. MOSKOWITZ, JUDGE, USDC SD CA
99-8210   GAINES, J. B. vs. DALLAS COUNTY, ET AL.
99-8365   FIELDS, TONY M. V. JACKSON, ANNETTE
99-8521   WATERS, TIMOTHY E. V. HESSON, WARDEN
99-8526   BITTERMAN, STEPHAN A. V. HARDING, CHIEF JUSTICE
99-8590   JACKSON, ROBERT D. V. LUEBBERS, SUPT., POTOSI
99-8604   POWELL, BARRY J. V. TEXAS
99-8649   DeCARO, RICHARD V. UNITED STATES
99-8690   AYERS, JAMES A. V. MEMPHIS, TN, ET AL.
99-8743   FLANAGAN, BRUCE V. ARNAIZ, HOWARD, ET AL.
99-8806   YOUNG, LARRY A. V. SMEEKS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER
99-8926   DOUGHERTY, JAMES F. V. UNITED STATES
99-8960   ATAMIAN, GABRIEL G. V. GORKIN, ROBERT A.
99-9178   CONWAY, STEVEN A. V. GAMBLE, WARDEN

                   The petitions for rehearing are denied.


RECESS ORDER

                   The Court will take a recess from today,
              until Monday, October 2, 2000.

Ads by FindLaw