(ORDER LIST: 533 U.S.)
MONDAY, JUNE 18, 2001
The motion of respondent for leave to proceed informa pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ ofcertiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and thecase is remanded to the United States Court of Appealsfor the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in lightof Nguyen v. INS, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).00-525 ACKER, CHARLES J. V. UNITED STATES
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to theUnited States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuitfor further consideration in light of Kyllo v. UnitedStates, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).00-963 ASHCROFT, ATTY. GEN. V. LAKE, FREDERICK A.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to theUnited States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuitfor further consideration in light of Nguyen v. INS, 533U.S. ___ (2001).00-1194 CAMPBELL, SALLY, ET AL. V. ST. TAMMANY'S SCHOOL BD.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to theUnited States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit forfurther consideration in light of Good News Club v.Milford Central School , 533 U.S. ____ (2001).00-1428 RAPANOS, JOHN A. V. UNITED STATES
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to theUnited States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit forfurther consideration in light of Solid Waste Agency ofNo. Cook Cty. v. Army Corps of Engineers , 531 U.S. 159(2001).
The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief inthis case expressing the views of the United States.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.00-1577 CAIN, WARDEN V. RIDEAU, WILBERT
The motion of respondent for leave to proceed informa pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ ofcertiorari is denied.00-1653 GRIMES, CHARLES L. V. WETZLER, JAMES, ET AL.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.Justice Ginsburg took no part in the consideration ordecision of this petition.
The petitions for writs of habeas corpus aredenied.00-10228 IN RE JOHN G. WESTINE
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ ofhabeas corpus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
The petitions for writs of mandamus are denied.00-1671 IN RE JOHN KOJO MENSAH
The petition for writ of mandamus and/orprohibition is denied.
The petitions for rehearing are denied.00-1481 POWERS, ANN, ETC. V. CIR
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceedfurther herein in forma pauperis is granted. Thepetition for rehearing is denied.
Wayne B. Hollingsworth, of Naples, Florida, havingbeen suspended from the practice of law in this Court byorder of February 20, 2001; and a rule having beenissued requiring him to show cause why he should not bedisbarred;D-2239 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ROBERT J. ELKINSIt is ordered that Wayne B. Hollingsworth isdisbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
Robert J. Elkins, of Sarasota, Florida, having beensuspended from the practice of law in this Court byorder of February 20, 2001; and a rule having beenissued and served upon him requiring him to show causewhy he should not be disbarred; and the time to file aresponse having expired;D-2240 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MARK EVAN FREDERICKIt is ordered that Robert J. Elkins is disbarredfrom the practice of law in this Court.
Mark Evan Frederick, of Destin, Florida, havingbeen suspended from the practice of law in this Court byorder of February 20, 2001; and a rule having beenissued and served upon him requiring him to show causewhy he should not be disbarred; and the time to file aresponse having expired;D-2241 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF RICHARD GEORGE GOMSRUDIt is ordered that Mark Evan Frederick is disbarredfrom the practice of law in this Court.
Richard George Gomsrud, of St. Paul, Minnesota,having been suspended from the practice of law in thisCourt by order of February 20, 2001; and a rule havingbeen issued requiring him to show cause why he shouldnot be disbarred;D-2242 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ROBERT A. FREEMANIt is ordered that Richard George Gomsrud isdisbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
Robert A. Freeman, of Miami, Florida, having beensuspended from the practice of law in this Court byorder of February 20, 2001; and a rule having beenissued and served upon him requiring him to show causewhy he should not be disbarred; and the time to file aresponse having expired;D-2243 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ROGER A. McKEEIt is ordered that Robert A. Freeman is disbarredfrom the practice of law in this Court.
Roger A. McKee, of Phoenix, Arizona, having beensuspended from the practice of law in this Court byorder of February 20, 2001; and a rule having beenissued and served upon him requiring him to show causewhy he should not be disbarred; and the time to file aresponse having expired;D-2244 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF LEWIS MALAMUD SEAGULLIt is ordered that Roger A. McKee is disbarred fromthe practice of law in this Court.
Lewis Malamud Seagull, of Westfield, New Jersey,having been suspended from the practice of law in thisCourt by order of February 20, 2001; and a rule havingbeen issued and served upon him requiring him to showcause why he should not be disbarred; and the time tofile a response having expired;D-2248 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOSEPH DEE MORRISSEYIt is ordered that Lewis Malamud Seagull isdisbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
Joseph Dee Morrissey, of Richmond, Virginia, havingbeen suspended from the practice of law in this Court byorder of February 20, 2001; and a rule having beenissued and served upon him requiring him to show causewhy he should not be disbarred; and the time to file aresponse having expired;D-2249 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF STEPHEN PAUL RATHJENIt is ordered that Joseph Dee Morrissey isdisbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
Stephen Paul Rathjen, of Hauppauge, New York,having been suspended from the practice of law in thisCourt by order of February 20, 2001; and a rule havingbeen issued and served upon him requiring him to showcause why he should not be disbarred; and the time tofile a response having expired;D-2251 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DENNIS MICHAEL BARRETTIt is ordered that Stephen Paul Rathjen isdisbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
Dennis Michael Barrett, of Murfreesboro, Tennessee,having been suspended from the practice of law in thisCourt by order of February 26, 2001; and a rule havingbeen issued requiring him to show cause why he shouldnot be disbarred;D-2252 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF PAUL McGEEIt is ordered that Dennis Michael Barrett isdisbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
Paul McGee, of Atlanta, Georgia, having beensuspended from the practice of law in this Court byorder of February 26, 2001; and a rule having beenissued requiring him to show cause why he should not bedisbarred;D-2253 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF STEPHEN D. SIEGFRIEDIt is ordered that Paul McGee is disbarred from thepractice of law in this Court.
Stephen D. Siegfried, of Hampton Bays, New York,having been suspended from the practice of law in thisCourt by order of February 26, 2001; and a rule havingbeen issued requiring him to show cause why he shouldnot be disbarred;It is ordered that Stephen D. Siegfried isdisbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
The Court will take a recess from todayuntil Monday, June 25, 2001.