(ORDER LIST: 533 U.S.)

FRIDAY, JUNE 29, 2001

CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to theUnited States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit forfurther consideration in light of INS v. St. Cyr, 533U.S. ___ (2001).

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to theSupreme Court of South Carolina for furtherconsideration in light of Palazzolo v. Rhode Island , 533U.S. ___ (2001).

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to theUnited States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit forfurther consideration in light of INS v. St. Cyr, 533U.S. ___ (2001).

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed informa pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ ofcertiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and thecase is remanded to the United States Court of Appealsfor the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in lightof Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed informa pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ ofcertiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and thecase is remanded to the United States Court of Appealsfor the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in lightof Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed informa pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ ofcertiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and thecase is remanded to the United States Court of Appealsfor the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in lightof Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to theUnited States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit forfurther consideration in light of Zadvydas v. Davis, 533U.S. ___ (2001).

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed informa pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ ofcertiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and thecase is remanded to the United States Court of Appealsfor the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in lightof Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed informa pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ ofcertiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and thecase is remanded to the United States Court of Appealsfor the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in lightof Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed informa pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ ofcertiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and thecase is remanded to the United States Court of Appealsfor the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in lightof Zavdydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed informa pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ ofcertiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and thecase is remanded to the United States Court of Appealsfor the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in lightof Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed informa pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ ofcertiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and thecase is remanded to the United States Court of Appealsfor the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in lightof Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed informa pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ ofcertiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and thecase is remanded to the United States Court of Appealsfor the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in lightof Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed informa pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ ofcertiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and thecase is remanded to the United States Court of Appealsfor the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in lightof Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed informa pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ ofcertiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and thecase is remanded to the United States Court of Appealsfor the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in lightof Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to theUnited States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuitfor further consideration in light of Federal ElectionComm n v. Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Comm. ,533 U.S. ___ (2001).

The motion of AARP for leave to file a brief asamicus curiae is granted. The petition for a writ ofcertiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and thecase is remanded to the Court of Appeals of Arizona,Division One, for further consideration in light ofTroxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (2000).

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to theUnited States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit forfurther consideration in light of INS v. St. Cyr, 533U.S. ___ (2001).

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorariare granted. The judgment is vacated and the case isremanded to the United States Court of Appeals for theEleventh Circuit for further consideration in light ofINS v. St. Cyr, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorariare granted. The judgment is vacated and the case isremanded to the United States Court of Appeals for theFifth Circuit for further consideration in light of INSv. St. Cyr, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

ORDERS IN PENDING CASES

The motions to direct the Clerk to file petitionsfor writs of certiorari out-of-time are denied.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperiswithout an affidavit of indigency executed by petitioneris denied.

The motion of the River Master for fees and expensesis granted, and the River Master is granted a total of$2,645.00 for the period January 1 March 31,, 2001, to bepaid equally by the parties.

The motion of the Solicitor General for leave toparticipate in oral argument as amicus curiae and fordivided argument is granted. Justice O'Connor took nopart in the consideration or decision of this motion.

The motion of the Solicitor General for dividedargument is granted. The motion of BellSouthCorporation, et al., for additional time for oralargument is granted. Thirty additional minutes areallotted for that purpose to be divided as follows: 45minutes for petitioners in No. 00-511, 15 minutes forpetitioners in Nos. 00-555 and 00-590, and 30 minutesfor the Solicitor General. Justice O'Connor took no partin the consideration or decision of these motions.

The motion of Pennsylvania Public UtilityCommission for leave to file a brief as amicus curiaeis granted. The motion of the Solicitor General foradditional time for oral argument and for dividedargument is granted and ten additional minutes areallotted for oral argument to be divided as follows: 20minutes for petitioners in No. 00-568, 20 minutes forpetitioner in No. 00-809, and 30 minutes for theSolicitor General. The request for divided rebuttal isdenied.

The motion of petitioner to dispense with printingthe joint appendix is granted.

The motion of the Solicitor General for dividedargument is granted. Justice O'Connor took no part inthe consideration or decision of this motion.

The motions of the Solicitor General for leave toparticipate in oral argument as amicus curiae and fordivided argument are granted.

The motion for appointment of counsel is grantedand it is ordered that Victoria A. Brambl, Esq., ofTucson, Arizona, is appointed to serve as counsel forthe respondent in this case.

The application for stay addressed to Justice Breyerand referred to the Court is denied.

The motion of petitioner for reconsideration oforder denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis isdenied.

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed informa pauperis are denied. Petitioners are allowed untilJuly 20, 2001, within which to pay the docketing feesrequired by Rule 38(a) and to submit petitions incompliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

CERTIORARI GRANTED

The motion of National Association of InsuranceCommissioners for leave to file a brief as amicus curiaeis granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari isgranted.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is grantedlimited to the following question: "Whether the Court ofAppeals properly determined that a temporary moratoriumon land development does not constitute a taking ofproperty requiring compensation under the Takings Clauseof the United States Constitution?"

CERTIORARI DENIED

The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.

The motion of Committee on State Taxation for leaveto file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. Thepetition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

The motion of Attorney General of Michigan forleave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. Thepetition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

The motion of Cingular Wireless LLC, Salmon PCSLL,and Verizon for leave to file a brief as amici curiae isgranted. The petition for a writ of certiorari isdenied.

The motion of Reporters Committee for Freedom ofthe Press, et al., for leave to file a brief as amicicuriae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorariis denied.

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ ofcertiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As thepetitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process,the Clerk is directed not to accept any furtherpetitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unlessthe docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and thepetition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. SeeMartin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals , 506U.S. 1 (1992) ( per curiam). Justice Stevens dissents.See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ ofcertiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.

MANDAMUS DENIED

The petitions for writs of mandamus are denied.

REHEARINGS DENIED

The petitions for rehearing are denied.

The motion for leave to file a petition forrehearing is denied.

RECESS ORDER

The Court will take a recess from today untilMonday, October 1, 2001.