[Download PDF]

(ORDER LIST: 536 U.S.)

MONDAY, JUNE 24, 2002

APPEAL --SUMMARY DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

CERTIORARI --SUMMARY DISPOSITION

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. Moran, 536 U.S. ___ (2002).

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of City of Columbus v. Ours Garage and Wrecker Service, Inc., 536 U.S. ___ (2002).

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of City of Columbus v. Ours Garage and Wrecker Service, Inc., 536 U.S. ___ (2002).

ORDERS IN PENDING CASES

The motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for a writ of certiorari out-of-time is denied.

The motions of petitioners for reconsideration of orders denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis are denied.

CERTIORARI GRANTED

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted limited to Questions 1, 2 and 3 presented by the petition.

The motion of respondent William Hibbs for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.

CERTIORARI DENIED

The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.

The motion of petitioners, in No. 01-1158, for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public is granted. The motion of American Free Trade Association for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The motion of respondent Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd., in No. 01-1158, for leave to file a brief in opposition under seal with redacted copies of the brief for the public is granted. The motion of Costco Wholesale Corporation for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The motion of Grandway USA Corporation to be substituted in place of petitioner Dynatec International, Inc., is denied. The motion petitioner, in No. 01-1376, for leave to file a cross-petition for a writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public is granted. The motion of respondents Jazz Photo Corp., et al. for leave to file a supplemental brief in No. 01-1376 under seal with redacted copies for the public is granted. The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.

The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied. Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

The motion of Kenneth A. Rushton, Chapter XI Trustee, for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Stevens dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.

HABEAS CORPUS DENIED

The petitions for writs of habeas corpus are denied.

MANDAMUS DENIED

The petitions for writs of mandamus are denied.

REHEARINGS DENIED

The petitions for rehearing are denied.

The motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing is denied.

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE

Martin Eric Marks, of Great Neck, New York, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of March 4, 2002; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired;

It is ordered that Martin Eric Marks is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

Theodore William Bushlow, of Brooklyn, New York, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of March 4, 2002; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired;

It is ordered that Theodore William Bushlow is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

Murrey L. Grider, of Pocahontas, Arkansas, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of March 4, 2002; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired;

It is ordered that Murrey L. Grider is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

F. Lee Bailey, of West Palm Beach, Florida, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of March 18, 2002; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired;

It is ordered that F. Lee Bailey is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

Ragnhild Anne Westby, of Saint Paul, Minnesota, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring her to show cause why she should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

William P. Hovell, of Spring Valley, California, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

Peter L. Benjamin, of Merrillville, Indiana, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

David Glenn Reynolds, of Placitas, New Mexico, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

Joel R. Brandes, of Garden City, New York, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

Anthony F. Leonardo, Jr., of Rochester, New York, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

Peter S. Zogby, of New Hartford, New York, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

RECESS ORDER