(ORDER LIST: 538 U.S.)
MONDAY, MARCH 10, 2003
CERTIORARI --SUMMARY DISPOSITION
01-1487 MAYLE, WARDEN, ET AL. V. BROWN, RICHARD N., ET AL.01-9879 HERBERT, TODD A. V. UNITED STATESThe motion of respondents for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Lockyer v. Andrade, 538 U. S. ___ (2003).
01-10898 SIFFORD, CURTIS V. UNITED STATESThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for further consideration in light of Clay v. United States, 537 U. S. ___ (2003).
02-127 McGRATH, WARDEN, ET AL. V. CHIA, MICHAEL S.The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for further consideration in light of Clay v. United States, 537 U. S. ___ (2003).
02-6427 SIMBOLI, ROBERT V. CROSBY, SEC., FL DOC, ET AL.The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Lockyer v. Andrade, 538 U. S. ___ (2003).
02-7089 QUICK, MELVIN V. UNITED STATESThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Clay v. United States, 537 U. S. ___ (2003).
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for further consideration in light of Clay v. United States, 537 U. S. ___ (2003).
ORDERS IN PENDING CASES
02A624 DIANE P. GILES V. JOHN ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL02M64 BEATY, DONALD E. V. RYAN, ACT. DIR., AZ DOCThe application for stay addressed to Justice Stevens and referred to the Court is denied.
02-94 OVERTON, DIR., MI DOC V. BAZZETTA, MICHELLE, ET AL.The motions to direct the Clerk to file petitions for writs of certiorari out-of-time are denied.
02-102 LAWRENCE, JOHN G., ET AL. V. TEXASThe motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument is granted.
02-241 GRUTTER, BARBARA V. BOLLINGER, LEE, ET AL.The motion of Center for Law and Justice International for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted.
02-516 GRATZ, JENNIFER, ET AL. V. BOLLINGER, LEE, ET AL.The motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument is granted. The motion of Exxon Mobil Corporation for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The motion of respondent Kimberly James, et al. for enlargement of argument time and for divided argument, or in the alternative, for divided argument is denied.
02-634 GREEN TREE FINANCIAL CORP. V. BAZZLE, LYNN W., ET AL.The motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument is granted. The motion of Exxon Mobil Corporation for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The motion of respondent Ebony Patterson, et al. for additional argument time and for divided argument, or in the alternative, for divided argument is denied.
02-722 AM. INS. ASSN., ET AL. V. GARAMENDI, JOHN, ETC.The motion of Washington Legal Foundation for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted.
02-857 HOUSEHOLD CREDIT SERVICES V. PFENNIG, SHARON R.The motion of Mitsubishi Materials Corporation, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted.
The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
CERTIORARI GRANTED
02-693 LAMIE, JOHN M. V. UNITED STATES TRUSTEE02-628 FREW, LINDA, ETC., ET AL. V. HAWKINS, COMM'R, TX H&HSThe petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
02-682 VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS V. LAW OFFICES OF CURTIS TRINKOThe petition for a writ of certiorari is granted limited to Questions 1 and 2 presented by the petition.
02-6320 FELLERS, JOHN J. V. UNITED STATESThe petition for a writ of certiorari is granted limited to the following Question: "Did the Court of Appeals err in reversing the District Court's dismissal of respondent's antitrust claims?"
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.
CERTIORARI DENIED
01-8816 BOWEN, JESUS P. V. CALIFORNIA02-638 AGENCIA LA ESPERANZA CORP. V. ORANGE CTY. BD. SUPERVISORSThe petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.
02-845 SILVEY, PATRICIA W. V. CHAO, SEC. OF LABORThe motion of National Association of Home Builders for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
02-996 OVERNITE TRANSP. CO. V. INT'L BRO. TEAMSTERS, ET AL.The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice Scalia took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
02-8408 EURY, MUHAMMAD A. S. vs. HAMILTON, SERGEANT, ET AL.The motion of National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Inc. for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The motion of Chamber of Commerce of the United States for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
The motions of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis are denied, and the petitions for writs of certiorari are dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
MANDAMUS DENIED
02-8412 IN RE KATHLEEN COLLINS AND MARY COLLINSThe petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.
REHEARINGS DENIED
01-618 ELDRED, ERIC, ET AL. V. ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL02-249 PEABODY COAL CO. V. GROVES, DIR., OWCPThe petitions for rehearing are denied.
02-670 HAUGHTON, RALSTON, ET UX. V. WAL-MART STORES, INC.The petition for rehearing is denied. Justice Scalia took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
The petitions for rehearing are denied. Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.
ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE
D-2346 IN THE MATTER OF CHARLES W. SULLIVAND-2347 IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF DAVID CALDWELLCharles W. Sullivan, of New York, New York, having requested to resign as a member of the Bar of this Court, it is ordered that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to the practice of law before this Court. The Rule to Show Cause, issued on February 24, 2003, is discharged.
D-2348 IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF MILES HARTMAN APPLEBERRYDavid Caldwell, of Dallas, Texas, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2349 IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF EDWARD NICHOLAS DANERIMiles Hartman Appleberry, of San Antonio, Texas, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2350 IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF STEVEN M. CARSEYEdward Nicholas Daneri, of San Antonio, Texas, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2351 IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF RONALD BRUCE LAYERSteven M. Carsey, of Fort Worth, Texas, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2352 IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF DENNIS FRANCIS MONAHANRonald Bruce Layer, of San Antonio, Texas, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2353 IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF JAMES ANTHONY GIBBONSDennis Francis Monahan, of Medway, Massachusetts, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
James Anthony Gibbons, of Clinton, Massachusetts, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.