(ORDER LIST: 547 U.S.)
MONDAY, JUNE 5, 2006
ORDERS IN PENDING CASES
05M83 MOORE, FREDDIE L. V. COLORADO05M84 FRUDAKIS, DEMETRIOS V. SUFFOLK CTY. DEPT. OF PUB. WORKSThe motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for a writ of certiorari out of time is denied.
05M85 BLANCO-LOYA, FELIPE V. UNITED STATESThe motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for a writ of certiorari out of time under Rule 14.5 is denied.
05M86 CREW, JOHN V. USPS, ET AL.The motion for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record is granted.
The motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for a writ of certiorari out of time is denied.
The motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied.
CERTIORARI GRANTED
05-908 PARENTS INVOLVED IN COMM. SCHS. V. SEATTLE SCH. DIST. NO. 105-9222 BURTON, LONNIE L. V. WADDINGTON, SUPT., STAFFORDThe petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. These cases will be argued in tandem.
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.
CERTIORARI DENIED
05-469 SCHAD, GEORGE C. V. JONES, ARTHUR L.04-1025 KIRBY, CARL E. V. ELIZABETH CITY, NC, ET AL.The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.
05-969 ) DROGIN, BOB, ET AL. V. LEE, WEN H., ET AL.The motion of Professional Fire Fighters and Paramedics of North Carolina, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
05-1119 CINGULAR WIRELESS, LLC V. MENDOZA, ASTRID, ET AL.The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied. Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.
05-10388 CHIN, MARK S. F. V. CAREY, WARDENThe motion of Pacific Legal Foundation for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The motion of American Bankers Association, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The motion of Chamber of Commerce of the United States for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The motion of Amazon.Com, Inc., et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
05-10755 MENDEZ, RAPHAEL V. USDC ED NCThe petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
05-10768 SMITH, BENJAMIN V. UNITED STATESThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Stevens dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
HABEAS CORPUS DENIED
05-10918 IN RE GENE A. GUINNThe petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.
REHEARING DENIED
05-858 ALSTON, ALSON V. PHILADELPHIA, ZONING BD., ET AL.05-1031 PALLOTTA, THOMAS V. BARNHART, COMM'R, SOCIAL SEC.The petitions for rehearing are denied.
05-6350 ZADEH, HAMID K. V. CALIFORNIAThe petitions for rehearing are denied. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.
The motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing is denied.
ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE
D-2420 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF VALERIE THERESA SIMUROD-2421 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MICHAEL DAVID ROSTOKERValerie Theresa Simuro, of Brooklyn, New York, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of February 21, 2006; and a rule having been issued and served upon her requiring her to show cause why she should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Valerie Theresa Simuro is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2422 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOEL DAVID TENENBAUMMichael David Rostoker, of Boulder Creek, California, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of February 21, 2006; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Michael David Rostoker is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2423 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF KENNETH TREMAYNE ISRAELJoel David Tenenbaum, of Greenville, Delaware, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of February 21, 2006; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Joel David Tenenbaum is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2424 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF BARRY GORDON ROBERTSKenneth Tremayne Israel, of Marietta, Georgia, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of February 21, 2006; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Kenneth Tremayne Israel is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2426 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF HARVEY JASON ZAMECKBarry Gordon Roberts, of Atlanta, Georgia, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of February 21, 2006; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Barry Gordon Roberts is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
Harvey Jason Zameck, of Southfield, Michigan, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of February 21, 2006; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Harvey Jason Zameck is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.