(ORDER LIST: 549 U.S.)
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 2007
CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
05-296 GOMEZ, EDWIN, ET AL. V. TENNESSEE05-816 CLARK, ORLANDO C. V. CO DOC, ET AL.The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Tennessee, Middle Division for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-874 BEY, LAMAR J. V. JOHNSON, KELLY, ET AL.The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit for further consideration in light of Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-6698 BRADFORD, DAVID A. V. CALIFORNIAThe petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-6793 BLACK, KEVIN M. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-7111 PARRAS, JOHN B. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of California for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-7309 MAUGAOTEGA, MITI V. HAWAIIThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-7321 PICADO, MAURICIO V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Hawaii for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-7325 JOHNSON, LOUIS D. V. MONROE, SANDRAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-7675 SALDANA, SAMUEL V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-7878 CONYERS, JAMES V. MI DOC, ET AL.The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-8031 SAMPLE, GEORGE C. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-8831 TARANGO, ARTURO V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U. S. ___ (2007).
05-8894 VAZQUEZ, JUAN M. V. RAGONESE, DAVID, ET AL.The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-8975 BLAY, DENNIS M. V. REILLY, JOHN, ET AL.The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit for further consideration in light of Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. ___ (2007). Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
05-9004 FRAWLEY, DOUGLAS V. NEW MEXICOThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit for further consideration in light of Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-9332 AUYON, BILLY J. V. CALIFORNIAThe motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the Supreme Court of New Mexico for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-9335 BRANHAM, RODNEY V. McCONNELL, REX, ET AL.The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-9485 ELLIOT, JAMES E. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-9582 FREEMAN, STEPHEN V. NEW MEXICOThe motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-9617 STROPE, MICHAEL L. V. McKUNE, WARDEN, ET AL.The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of New Mexico for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-9724 RAMIREZ, JOSEPH J. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit for further consideration in light of Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-9786 TEWOLDE, SAMUEL F. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-9803 MARIN, OSCAR V. CALIFORNIAThe motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-9831 HUGHES, ROBERT S. V. CALIFORNIAThe motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-9865 HERNANDEZ, LEONEL V. CALIFORNIAThe motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-9876 CROTEAU, JOHN R. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-9897 WILSON, DARRYEAL W. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division One for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U. S. ___ (2007).
05-9901 ) COX, DONALD D. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-9943 POWELL, GREGORY A. V. CALIFORNIAThe motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the cases are remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-9951 AGUILAR, RAUL V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-10011 JONES, RAYMOND V. CALIFORNIAThe motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-10053 DUNCAN, JOHN R. V. TENNESSEEThe motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-10072 DOWNER, COLLIE G. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Division for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-10091 PANG, KENNETH L. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-10113 HERNANDEZ, MANUEL J. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-10124 SPRANKLE, LARRY J. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-10183 CARRILLO, JOSHUA V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-10189 LEIGHTON, MICHAEL A. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-10193 TORRES, RODNEY C. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-10214 KING, JONATHAN V. NEW MEXICOThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-10215 JONES, JEREMY V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals of New Mexico for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-10247 RALBOVSKY, TIMOTHY P. V. CALIFORNIAThe motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-10255 LU, ERICA V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of California for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-10256 KING, MARK F. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-10272 HOLGUIN, OSCAR D. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-10299 MAGANA, JORGE V. CALIFORNIAThe motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-10311 VELASQUEZ, CESAR V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-10401 PRUITT, LANCE D. V. CALIFORNIAThe motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-10408 OWENS, DERRICK D. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-10428 ALASHANTI, MARQUIS I. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-10429 ALLEN, CURTIS V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-10435 BLACKWELL, RODNEY K. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-10442 CZUB, JOHN V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-10462 ) SANDERS, WANDA V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U. S. ___ (2007).
05-10466 ROBLES, ROGELIO G. V. CALIFORNIAThe motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the cases are remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-10477 BRUMBAUGH, SCOTT B. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-10485 SHEARER, MALCOLM L. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-10545 LOWRY, CARL A. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division One for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-10588 YANG, TENG V. CALIFORNIAThe motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-10589 WATSON, COY V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U. S. ___ (2007).
05-10609 TURNER, CHARLES E. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-10612 SMITH, JAMIE V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-10742 SINDORF, KURT E. V. CALIFORNIAThe motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-10775 HUGHES, RANDY L. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-10776 HILL, EDDIE L. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-10793 BALL, BOBBY D. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-10802 CASTRO, RONAL A. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-10984 WHEELER, CHRISTINA L. V. CALIFORNIAThe motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-11002 ACOSTA, JESUS X. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-11018 ORTEGA, ARMONDO G. V. CALIFORNIAThe motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-11045 KING, TRAMAINE V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-11123 YNCLAN, GINO R. V. CALIFORNIAThe motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-11141 LEARN, EDWARD L. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-11145 ALLEN, JOSEPH A. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-11149 VASQUEZ, FERNANDO V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-11192 LEE, NATHAN V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division One for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-11203 MORRIS, KEVIN L. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-11204 CENICEROS, JOHANNA V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-11223 SPEARS, HAMISI X. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U. S. ___ (2007).
05-11241 BANNER, LAWRENCE V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-11243 PAYTON, ISAIAH I. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-11269 BROWN, JERMAINE V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-11321 HAMILTON, ANTHONY V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-11327 MARTINEZ, NICHOLAS J. V. CALIFORNIAThe motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-11503 GALICIA, SATURNINO V. CALIFORNIAThe motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-11522 GORE, JOSEPH K. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-11569 ARRIAGA, ROBERT M. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-11610 BALLINGER, MICHAEL P. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-11618 WILLIAMS, TERYL A. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-11708 LIDDELL, DAVID S. V. CALIFORNIAThe motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-11712 PARTIN, COURTNEY V. TENNESSEEThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-11736 FULLER, GUY G. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, Eastern Division for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-11765 MAYO, JEROME V. TENNESSEEThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
05-11768 PEREZ, MARIO V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Division for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
06-396 KNOWLES, WARDEN V. MIRZAYANCE, ALEXANDREThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
06-5050 SMITH, CHARLES T. V. CALIFORNIAThe petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Carey v. Musladin, 549 U.S. ___ (2006).
06-5287 McELROY, WILLIAM E. V. CALIFORNIAThe motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
06-5292 CLARK, KAVRON V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
06-5332 MURPHY, TASAUNA D. V. CALIFORNIAThe motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
06-5414 BARRAGAN, JOSE L. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
06-5500 FROEMEL, ROCKY D. V. CALIFORNIAThe motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
06-5586 LOPEZ, CARLOS M. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
06-5629 KENNER, JAMES E. V. BELL, WARDENThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
06-5691 BOYD, PATRICK V. CALIFORNIAThe motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Division for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
06-5757 MUSHARBASH, JOSEPH V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
06-5989 LIGGION, JAQUAY V. CALIFORNIAThe motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
06-5990 RITCHIE, JUSTIN V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
06-6027 TU, VINCENT V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
06-6292 RODRIGUEZ, MANUEL V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
06-6381 BOUNDS, JAMES V. NEW MEXICOThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U. S. ___ (2007).
06-6420 WILLIAMS, ANTHONY L. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of New Mexico for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
06-6428 ALAMOUTI, MEHDI D. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
06-6468 McCULLER, RAYMOND A. V. MICHIGANThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
06-6620 BARNES, PAUL S. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Michigan for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
06-6660 GUEVARA, RICARDO V. CALIFORNIAThe motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
06-6703 BOCHICCHIO, BILL V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. ___ (2006).
06-6790 GUARTOS, BRYANT V. TENNESSEEThe motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
06-6892 SOLORIO, EMILIANO G. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Division for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
06-6992 NAYA, HORACIO V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of California for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
06-7105 CHEEKS, BETTY A. V. CALIFORNIAThe motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
06-7112 SIMENTAL, RAY T. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
06-7193 LANDCHO, RICARDO M. V. CALIFORNIAThe motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
06-7233 HUGHES, JOSEPH E. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
06-7301 ERVIN, VANCE R. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
06-7320 DUARTE, RAUL V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
06-7361 FERREIRA, ANTHONY V. McDONOUGH, SEC., FL DOC, ET AL.The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
06-7431 BAUTISTA, JUAN G. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Burton v. Stewart, 549 U. S. ___ (2007) (per curiam).
06-7453 HYLTON, JONATHAN R. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
06-7624 HARMON, GEORGE B. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
06-7739 RAMIREZ, MARTA V. CALIFORNIAThe motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
06-7766 REED, JACKIE R. V. CALIFORNIAThe motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
06-7796 YATES, SHON J. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
06-7871 OCHOA-PEREZ, FILIBERTO V. UNITED STATESThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
06-7977 SIQUEIROS, CLETO V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of Lopez v. Gonzales, 549 U.S. ___ (2006).
06-8101 MANUEL, TRAVIS V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
06-8208 JONES, LEONARD C. V. CALIFORNIAThe motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
06-8224 RODRIGUEZ, JOSHUA V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
06-8373 GONZALEZ, PETER S. V. CALIFORNIAThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
06-8425 RISTAU, STEVEN A. V. CALIFORNIAThe motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).
ORDERS IN PENDING CASES
06A498 CUNNINGHAM, RICK V. UNITED STATES06A619 (06-875) RODRIGUEZ, ISIDORO V. PEREIRA, DANILO, D. ET AL.The application for a certificate of appealability addressed to Justice Souter and referred to the Court is denied.
06A715 (06-875) RODRIGUEZ, ISIDORO V. PEREIRA, DANILO D. ET AL.The application for stay addressed to Justice Stevens and referred to the Court is denied.
06M59 RAMIREZ, RICHARD V. CALIFORNIAThe application for preliminary injunction addressed to Justice Stevens and referred to the Court is denied.
06M60 M. S. V. I. P., ET AL.The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis without an affidavit of indigency executed by petitioner is granted.
06M63 GRAY, DERRICK V. UNITED STATESThe motions to direct the Clerk to file petitions for writs of certiorari out of time are denied.
06M64 PATTERSON, BARRY N. V. SCHRIRO, DIR., AZ DOC, ET AL. 06M65 GLEAN, MICHAEL V. UNIV. OF GA, ET AL.The motion for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari under seal is denied.
132, ORIG. ALABAMA, ET AL. V. NORTH CAROLINAThe motions to direct the Clerk to file petitions for writs of certiorari out of time are denied.
05-1157 CREDIT SUISSE SEC. (USA), ET AL. V. BILLING, GLEN, ET AL.The motion of the Special Master for allowance of fees and reimbursement is granted, and the Special Master is awarded a total of $75,272.38 for the period November 17, 2003, through October 31, 2006, to be paid equally by the parties.
06-405 RAY, JAMES V. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.The motion of Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The motion of Washington Legal Foundation for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The motion of National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The motion of NYSE Group, Inc. for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The motion of W.R. Hambrecht + Co., LLC for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.
06-415 SELIG, JOHN, ET AL. V. PEDIATRIC SPECIALTY CARE, ET AL.The respondent is invited to file a response to the petition for rehearing within thirty days.
06-8662 IN RE JOHNNY SWANSONThe Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until March 13, 2007, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
CERTIORARI GRANTED
06-766 NY BD. OF ELECTIONS, ET AL. V. TORRES, MARGARITA L., ET AL.06-6911 LOGAN, JAMES D. V. UNITED STATESThe petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.
CERTIORARI DENIED
05-107 DAVIS, WARREN V. INT'L UNION, UNITED AUTO, ETC.05-1536 FRANK, WARDEN, ET AL. V. KAUA, WAYMANThe petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.
06-439 ) SUMMERS, JERRY, ET AL V. STATE STREET BANK & TRUST CO.The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
06-534 INITIATIVE INSTITUTE, ET AL. V. HERBERT, GARY, ET AL.The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied. Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.
06-592 KONTEH, KHELLEH V. BELL, CHRISTOPHERThe motion of Western Wildlife Conservancy, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
06-623 MISISCHIA, ARTHUR J. V. ST. JOHN'S MERCY HEALTH SYSTEMSThe motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
06-744 STACEY, RAYMOND V. HERMITAGE, PA, ET AL.The motion of Association of American Physicians and Surgeons for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
06-843 MORRISON, LARRY V. MADISON DEARBORN CAPITAL, ET AL.The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
06-844 MILLER, JEFFREY B. V. CONCHATTA, INC., ET AL.The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
06-7611 J. B. V. OHIOThe petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
06-8153 CRANE, EUGENE V. LAZARO, LUIS, ET AL.The motion of Juvenile Law Center for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
06-8266 OKPALA, OKEY G. V. DREW, WARDEN, ET AL.The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
06-8276 SPURLOCK, GILBERT L. V. BANK OF AMERICA, ET AL.The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Stevens dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.
06-8287 KIKUMURA, YU V. HOOD, WARDEN, ET AL.The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
06-8299 ANDREWS, ANTOLIN V. HAFEY, TONI, ET AL.The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
06-8445 MURDOCK, MARK A. V. AM. EX. CENTURION BANK, ET AL.The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis are denied, and the petitions for writs of certiorari are dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
06-8483 BRITTON, JIMMY R. V. AIMCO SANDALWOOD L.P.The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Stevens dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.
06-9046 CARSON, SAMUEL, ET AL. V. UNITED STATESThe petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
HABEAS CORPUS DENIED
06-931 IN RE JOYCE PATTERSON-BEGGS06-8902 IN RE VAN L. BREWERThe petitions for writs of habeas corpus are denied.
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
MANDAMUS DENIED
06-809 IN RE JOYCE PATTERSON-BEGGS06-745 IN RE RAYMOND STACEYThe petitions for writs of mandamus are denied.
06-754 IN RE EILEEN VEYThe petition for a writ of mandamus is denied. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
06-8904 IN RE DAVID E. WATTLETONThe petitions for writs of mandamus and/or prohibition are denied.
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of mandamus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
REHEARINGS DENIED
05-6764 ALLEN, BILLIE J. V. UNITED STATES06-636 GOODMAN, LAURENCE R. V. UNITED STATESThe petitions for rehearing are denied.
The motions for leave to file petitions for rehearing are denied.